|Route||Total Boardings||Average boardings per trip|
A few conclusions seem possible from the above data:
- 392 corridor is under serviced. This picks up 3 trip generators - Eastgardens, UNSW and the CBD so it is possible that a number of trips see spaces occupied more than once, but even so it seems an upgrade is justified. I would go further and say that the 392 trips should all be converted into an L92, serving L94 stops between the Kingsford nine ways and Museum, running every 15 minutes until 11:30pm 7 days a week. The L94 should also provide the same level of service.
- 341 could presumably be more cheaply served by some sort of para transit on demand service.
- 316 under achieves. It could be better removed and converted into 317 trips and improve the legibility of the service.
- 302 under achieves. It is noted that while this serves UNSW, Eastgardens and the CBD it seems that people don't find the service very attractive, in spite of all the destinations served and the low frequencies of the alternatives. The route could be reviewed and perhaps folded into the 303. Serving Central would be sure to increase the potential patronage. There are some 303 short workings from Todman Ave to Botany, which suggests a Botany terminus could be more desirable, although I am not sure why. Alternatively, the marketing could be the problem.
- 376/377 corridor does not justify two routes. If there was integrated fares, there would not need to be two routes - via Central and via Oxford St. Those going to Central would be able to interchange. As a former user of the common part of the 373/377 corridor, I can report that the majority of the 377 patronage comes from the common part of the corridor.
- X09 seems to under perform. This seems to be mostly due to train fares to Green Square station being reduced. This route has since seen a 20% reduction (-2 trips in the PM peak), as with the X10.
- M10 and M20 perform arguably satisfactorily.
The L09 operates counter peak only so if it isn't collecting passengers it would be dead running anyway, so I have no concern about that one.
An alternative to the proposed L92 would be an L96, based on the argument that between the 395 and 396 Maroubra Beach is busier, but that ignores the patronage which would be generated by the frequency increase as well as the patronage from the 391, which is unknown.
Basic problem is that there are insufficient service kilometres in Sydney outside of peak hours, even if this is the least severe in the Eastern Suburbs.